Chemical manufacturing giant DuPont (DD: Charts, News) suffered a major setback this week, after a federal jury ordered the company to pay a $1 billion patent infringement settlement to rival Monsanto (MON: Charts, News) over its genetically modified seeds technology. The jury found that DuPont knowingly infringed on Monsanto's patent for its herbicide-resistant Roundup Ready seeds. These seeds, considered Monsanto's flagship brand, are engineered to be resistant to Monsanto's glyphosate-based herbicides, and are a critical part of its business strategy to simultaneously sell seeds and herbicides. The patent infringement settlement is the fourth-largest in U.S. history. Monsanto and DuPont are the two largest companies in the $34 billion commercial seed market. $13.3 billion of the seed market is now generated by genetically modified seeds. Daily Chart The dispute started in 2009, after DuPont produced its Optimum GAT soybean seed, which was genetically modified to withstand glyphosate-based herbicides. DuPont claims that the Optimum GAT project, which combines aspects of its own genetic modifications with Monsanto's, was abandoned last year and the seeds were never sold. However, Monsanto claimed that the project violated a 2002 licensing agreement between the two companies. This resulted in DuPont counter-suing Monsanto for anti-competitive practices. Monsanto also offered DuPont a chance to license its patented product, which the company refused. Monsanto's glyphosate-resistant trait is widely used in crops such as alfalfa, corn, cotton, canola and sugar beets. Roundup Ready is present in 95% of soybeans in the United States, and has generated $22 billion in sales over the past five years. Monsanto licenses its product to over 200 other companies as well. Monsanto's Roundup Ready products are the main source of its annual revenue of $13.7 billion. "DuPont strongly disagrees with the verdict," the company stated. "There were several fundamental errors in the case which deprived the jury of important facts and arguments." DuPont has stated that it will appeal the verdict. DuPont's general counsel, Thomas L. Sager, believes that the $1 billion charge is "unjustified" since DuPont "never sold a single Optimum GAT seed and has no plans to do so in the future." DuPont also claims that Monsanto used"deceptive practices' to initially obtain the seed patents, referring to the "mixing of patent claims from 1990 and 1994 applications" which masked facts that could have blocked the patent. DuPont asserts that Monsanto's patent is invalid. Monsanto has since asked the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to reissue the corrected patent. Monsanto's Executive VP David Snively was pleased with the ruling, stating, "This verdict highlights that all companies that make early and substantial investments in developing cutting-edge technology will have their intellectual property rights upheld and fairly valued." Although a payment of $1 billion is unlikely to hamper DuPont in the long run, the decision is likely to cap the growth potential of its seeds business segment, which is a major part of its Agriculture and Nutrition Segment. That segment, which accounts for approximately a third of the company's revenue, posted a 17% increase in sales for fiscal 2011. The growth potential of DuPont's seeds business stands out in comparison to its Performance Coatings and Pharmaceuticals segments. Most analysts are still bullish on DuPont, which trades at 10.6 times forward earnings with a 5-year PEG ratio of 1.5. The stock is up nearly 7% since the beginning of the year but has been down 2% over the past twelve months. The stock pays a quarterly dividend of 43 cents per share, a 3.5% yield at current prices. Other News About DD Monsanto Shares Rise After $1 Bln Award Against DuPont Monsanto strikes a critical blow against rival DuPont. DD a Top 25 Dividend Giant With $1.29 B Held By ETFs DuPont remains a favorite of income investors. Other Stocks in the News Bristol-Myers Squibb Exec Arrested For Insider Trading More bad news from the world of big pharma. GM Profit Helped By Delayed Spending, Better-Than-Expected Europe GM's earnings were weak, but still better than expectations. Copyright 2012 by InvestorGuide.com, Inc. InvestorGuide has no control over the sites we link to, is not affiliated with these sites, and cannot take responsibility for their quality or suitability. The news, analysis, commentary and profile information is not meant to be comprehensive, and the data provided is not guaranteed to be accurate. WebFinance Inc., the publisher of this newsletter, is not a registered investment advisor or a broker/dealer. This is not a stock recommendation newsletter but rather a source for investment ideas, and we encourage you to fully research any company before considering investing. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of nor are they endorsed by WebFinance Inc. No employee of WebFinance has owned or currently owns any shares in the company described above. The above is neither an offer nor solicitation to buy or sell any securities. The trading of securities may not be suitable for all potential readers of this newsletter, and the purchase of stocks mentioned in this newsletter may result in the loss of some or all of any investment made. We recommend that you consult a stockbroker or financial advisor before buying or selling securities or making investment decisions. We are not responsible for claims made by advertisers and sponsors. Anyone who makes decisions based on what they read here does so at their own risk and cannot hold WebFinance Inc. (DBA InvestorGuide.com, Inc.) or its employees responsible.
Recent Commentary and Articles
- Making an Investment Plan: Tactical vs Strategic Moves
- Everything You Need to Know About the Heinz Kraft Merger
- Plenty of Opportunities on the Table Despite a Slow Week
- No Friday Rally for the Markets as Stocks Remain Flat
- BlackBerry (BBRY) Reports Surprise Profit, Misses on Revenue
- Markets Continue to Drop, Dow Loses Another 40 Points
- How Will Interest Rates Influence the S&P 500?