Aircraft manufacturer Boeing’s (BA: Charts, News) suffered a major setback this month, after safety concerns arose regarding its flagship 787 Dreamliner aircraft. The revolutionary, next-generation 787s are manufactured from lightweight composite materials and re-engineered electrical systems, which allow them to be 15-20% more fuel efficient than older aircraft. In these days of unstable gas prices – which often force airlines to hedge futures just to maintain a stable financial outlook – the Dreamliner was the dream aircraft that many airlines had been waiting for. Before the first Dreamliner even took off in 2011, Boeing had a backlog of 753 orders to fill – a record demand for a new aircraft.
Boeing’s Dreamliner headaches started earlier this month, when a problem with a lithium-ion battery forced an All Nippon Airways flight to make an emergency landing at Takamatsu airport. Later, another battery caught fire in a parked Japan Airlines’ flight at Boston Logan International Airport. Initial tests showed that the battery was not overcharged and was properly maintained.
These incidents forced Japan’s transport ministry and the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration to ground all 50 787 Dreamliners until a joint probe can thoroughly investigate the company that manufactures the Dreamliners’ lithium-ion batteries, GS Yuasa Corp. The investigation officially commenced this Monday. Some of Boeing’s critics have claimed that the troubles were caused by the outsourcing of 70% of the plane’s parts to cut expenses, which caused incongruities in design and execution.
Although analysts don’t expect Boeing’s stock to take much of a long-term hit from the Dreamliner fiasco, several airline companies, dependent on the Dreamliner to revive their lagging fortunes, could suffer greatly. Fort Worth-based American Airlines, which is currently bankrupt, is counting on adding the Dreamliner to its fleet by 2014 as part of its turnaround efforts. American has since ordered 42 Dreamliners.
Boeing’s current problems also represent an opportunity for its primary competitor Airbus, which has since released a larger aircraft, the A380. With the A380, Airbus opted for a larger size over fuel efficiency, believing that it could make up for the extra fuel costs by carrying more passengers. Airbus received 257 orders for the A380 since its release, but only 92 orders have been filled.
Airbus, a subsidiary of EADS (European Aeronautic Defense and Space) (EADSY: Charts, News) has fallen behind Boeing in the number of passenger jets sold over the past five years. Boeing has sold 1,203 jets, compared to Airbus’ 833. In commercial aircraft, Airbus has also lagged Boeing for the past ten years, selling 588 compared to Boeing’s 601. Looking forward, Airbus intends to sell 700 passenger jets this year to pull back ahead of Boeing.
Over the past twelve months, shares of Boeing have gone nowhere, dipping a mere 0.64%. Over the past five years, shares have slid 4.29%. The reason for this stagnation was the long initial wait for the Dreamliner, which was delayed repeatedly due to several mechanical failures. When the Dreamliner finally took off in 2011, Boeing shareholders breathed a sigh of relief. Unfortunately, it looks like shareholders are going to have to wait again.
Boeing trades at 14.6 times forward earnings with a 5-year PEG ratio of 1.25. The stock pays a quarterly dividend of 49 cents per share – a 2.49% yield at current prices.
Other News About BA
Despite Boeing 787 Problems, Company Retakes Top In Sales
Boeing continues to dominate Airbus.
Investigators Look at Battery Problem in Grounded 787s
A joint probe officially starts into Boeing’s Dreamliner problems.
Other Stocks in the News
Inside the 21st Century Wallet: eBayand PayPal
Will eBay and PayPal own your wallet soon?
Microsoft’sQ2: Time to Kick Ballmer and PCs to the Curb
Is it time for Steve Ballmer to step down?
Copyright 2013 by InvestorGuide.com, Inc. InvestorGuide has no control over the sites we link to, is not affiliated with these sites, and cannot take responsibility for their quality or suitability. The news, analysis, commentary and profile information is not meant to be comprehensive, and the data provided is not guaranteed to be accurate. WebFinance Inc., the publisher of this newsletter, is not a registered investment advisor or a broker/dealer. This is not a stock recommendation newsletter but rather a source for investment ideas, and we encourage you to fully research any company before considering investing. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of nor are they endorsed by WebFinance Inc.
No employee of WebFinance has owned or currently owns any shares in the company described above. The above is neither an offer nor solicitation to buy or sell any securities. The trading of securities may not be suitable for all potential readers of this newsletter, and the purchase of stocks mentioned in this newsletter may result in the loss of some or all of any investment made. We recommend that you consult a stockbroker or financial advisor before buying or selling securities or making investment decisions.
We are not responsible for claims made by advertisers and sponsors. Anyone who makes decisions based on what they read here does so at their own risk and cannot hold WebFinance Inc. (DBA InvestorGuide.com, Inc.) or its employees responsible.